The deeply emotional conviction of the presence of a superior reasoning Power, which is revealed in the incomprehensible universe, forms my idea of God. I know who he is, i have got many of his books. i just wanted YOUR definition of a dawkins type athiest. This shows that even if you dont agree with me, science and the bible are NOT opposites. They need his reputation on their side, so much, that they will blatently lie.If you didn’t know my character, and my first statement on these forums was; My religion consists of a humble admiration of the illimitable superior Spirit who reveals himself in the slight details we are able to perceive with our frail and feeble minds. Mitchell is a Christian – which you would realize if you had ever read even one of his posts.Do you realize how dumb you are making yourself out to be?

Are you some kind of joke – someone who really isn’t a JW but is trying to stir hatred for them?Seriously, I can’t figure you out. Isaac newton was one of these. And yes, Jehv. I’d say.

Einstein is the icon of modern-science, and as far as the fanatical atheist is concerned, its just plain wrong that this great scientist and personality should believe in the object of their irrational hate, namely God. Well said brain. That statement was not a statement of his belief in god as he was an outspoken athiest, agnostic at best Didn’t I tell you to cap “G” for “God?”Ezra, no all-caps posting please. -Jeremyhfht Witns. are Christians in the same sense, sort of, that I am a Christian. Maybe you hadnt realised it. I am unware of any quote from Einstein which can be construed as a total repudiation of the concept of God in it’s entirety.

Evolutionsist who make claims that science is at odds with the bible have no grounds for this. We are christians, the so called christians are christendom, not christians. Would you come to the conclusion that I am an atheist, or an agnostic?What about a snipet from one of the quotes I put foreward; …I’m not an atheist and I don’t think I can call myself a pantheist…

As well as the sound moral guidelines of the bible. His position was truly one of a scientist, in that he wanted to know how God manifested the universe. My impression is now that JW society is a cloak for child molestation – Truth, get out before you get in too deep.Result – JW’s classified alongside another religion… Originally Posted by Truth1010 Einsteins seems to have had different views about god at different times. William your anger out weighs your knowledge of jehovahs witnesses.

Since Sir Isaac Newton was not a Jehova Witness and since you believe that all other religions are inspired by the devil, then the logical conclusion for you was that he was an unwitting devil worshiper and the devil’s property and slave and this makes your comments praising him somewhat hollow. In the 15th and 16th centuries when modern science began to take shape, the science was not intended as a replacement of Christianity. Maybe you hadnt realised it.

In France, they even put Free Thought up-with its own ceremonies as a sort of religion.So, most of the early scientists were Christian deists but often not theists. Google richard dawkins if you are wanting more info. There are many interviews with him in youtube. The scientists today, who are hell-bent on proving God does not exist, are scientists on paper, such as the priests and clergy who do not believe in God, are priests by proffesion, rather than conviction.Jan. Einstein was an intelligent man, and intelligent people know they cannot repudiate something which they do not grasp fully.

Would you consider me atheist? Einstein had his own understanding of the universe but taken as a whole it seems clear that it included something intelligent besides mankind. Im currently reading his latest book. “The god delusion” very interesting indeed and that is where the einstein quotes came from and hence the title of this thread Also i have no interest in putting a capital g for god as everybody understands what i mean with a lower case g. That is, they believed as “liberal Christians” in not being so gullable about the myths and miracles stated in the Bible.Now, it is different. His alleged repudiations of God are mostly statement which say to the effect: I don’t believe in idea about God; I don’t agree with that concept of God.

Richard dawkins type athiests are rare , as inside all of us is a need for answers and god to most people seems to sensible one. Originally Posted by Truth1010 Mitchell if isaac newton accepted god exists and hes one of youre greatest scientist it makes people like yourself, who arent as scientificly knowledgeable and yet an athiest look very insignificant. There are many interviews with him in youtube. Richard dawkins in one of the most prominent evolutionists today.

There is a difference between Christians and Christendom. daytonturner, They are not quite religious enough to satisfy the religious nor are they atheistic enough to satisfy atheists. Originally Posted by jan ardena daytonturner, They are not quite religious enough to satisfy the religious nor are they atheistic enough to satisfy atheists. If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it. (Albert Einstein, 1954) The idea of a personal god is quite alien to me and seems even naive and if he is a agnostic. Would you come to the conclusion that I am an atheist, or an agnostic?What about a snipet from one of the quotes I put foreward; …I’m not an atheist and I don’t think I can call myself a pantheist…

Where do you get the idea that atheist’s ‘hate’ god? I do not believe in God, indeed were I, or any other atheist to ‘hate’ God it would be an automatic admission that God existed!And Einstein, do you think that atheists believe Einstein was an atheist? there is no hard evidence either way, As I have proposed before he seemed to play to his audience, there is simply no record of any Einstein statement which declares or utters an unequivocal statement either way.If some evidence came to light which showed him to have been a devout catholic or Jew it would make no difference to his personal contribution to science. So what are these comments about Newton anyway? Are buy zovirax online. you back-sliding?

Are you slumming? Is your humanity peeking out from under your JW aloofness. It says in the link, if you had read it, what religion newton was. How convenient.

Mitchell if isaac newton accepted god exists and hes one of youre greatest scientist it makes people like yourself, who arent as scientificly knowledgeable and yet an athiest look very insignificant. I am unware of any quote from Einstein which can be construed as a total repudiation of the concept of God in it’s entirety. The deeply emotional conviction of the presence of a superior reasoning Power, which is revealed in the incomprehensible universe, forms my idea of God. The term “Christendom” is comparablde to the term “Islam” and refers to the society based on that faith. This is an interesting read about his views on religion…http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaac_N…eligious_views sorry the forums playing up the last couple of days. just picked up on this. can you clarify what you mean by richard dawkins type athiests? im not sure exactly what that means to you?

He basicly sells many books on both his passion for evolution and his hatred of religion and god. For me isaac newton is the finest scientific mind of them all. Rene Compe even tried to replace Christianity with his own so-called science of religion.

The scientists today, who are hell-bent on proving God does not exist, are scientists on paper, such as the priests and clergy who do not believe in God, are priests by proffesion, rather than conviction.Jan. I honor Christian holidays, go by its callender, follow its marital traditions, observe much of the Christian ethic and even think that Christmass manger scenes are “cute.” I even speak out Christ’s name involluntarily when I hit my finger with the hammer!charles, http://humanpurpose.simplenet.com According to you, you are not a part of the world and that seems to mean that everything that is not a part of the JW program is worthy of contempt. Originally Posted by Truth1010 Richard dawkins in one of the most prominent evolutionists today. They need his reputation on their side, so much, that they will blatently lie.If you didn’t know my character, and my first statement on these forums was; buy essay cheap online
My religion consists of a humble admiration of the illimitable superior Spirit who reveals himself in the slight details we are able to perceive with our frail and feeble minds. The Intelligent Design group is a mere fringe.charles, http://humanpurpose.simplenet.com At least he answers Mitches posts…If you want to know the truth about JW’s type in”‘Jehovah’s witness convicted paedophile” into google and read the pages and pages and pages of them, PLUS the fact that as a closed society they are taught that all outsiders are guided by Satan so if any are abused going outside will not help them…. Back to the main point that newton did believe in god and felt strongly about this. It was merely a way to find answers that the Scriptures did not answer.

We all are able to learn or change our minds. As this happened, free thinkers such as Voltair and Diderot became public figures and science became a force in itself. Truth, you really are stupid or you simply don’t bother to read other’s posts. Gradually, it developed and grew until it was finding answers that conflicted with what the scriptures said. They go hand in hand.

Originally Posted by captaincaveman daytonturner, sorry to go slightly off topic. but i noticed your einstein quote in your signature and just been reading about that quote. do you realise einstein didn’t believe in god as a personal god. Few great scientists are. Would you consider me atheist?

Einstein had his own understanding of the universe but taken as a whole it seems clear that it included something intelligent besides mankind. Among members of the National Academy of Science, a large number are actual atheists with Free Thinkers and liberal Christians making up the vast majority. He basicly sells many books on both his passion for evolution and his hatred of religion and god. I can’t believe that you are really this dumb…. Google richard dawkins if you are wanting more info.

His alleged repudiations of God are mostly statement which say to the effect: I don’t believe in idea about God; I don’t agree with that concept of God. I’d say. His faith was at one with the discoveries he made.

Einstein was an intelligent man, and intelligent people know they cannot repudiate something which they do not grasp fully. Einstein is the icon of modern-science, and as far as the fanatical atheist is concerned, its just plain wrong that this great scientist and personality should believe in the object of their irrational hate, namely God. Yet he also was a scientist and studied the bible throughly. The bible still stands the test of time and is at one with scientific knowledge we have at this point in time. TRUTH1010: “We are christians, the so called christians are christendom, not christians.”I know what you are trying to say.

Or are you so petty to pick up on unimportant things like that As ghandi once said ” if we all got together and followed what jesus said at the sermon on the mount, then we would get on fine.” Well I think William’s comment was quite appropriate and I laughed my head off. this is why i assumed he was an athiest at best a weak agnostic I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. But einstein certainly was never against the possiblity of god. His position was truly one of a scientist, in that he wanted to know how God manifested the universe.

My personal understanding of his beliefs leads me to the conviction that he believed in the possible existence of a superior being or creator.